Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Twin Medical Marijuana Bills Introduced on Beacon Hill

Champions of legislation confident patients will see relief this session


BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS - Senate President Pro Tempore Stanley Rosenberg (D-Amherst) has joined Representative Frank I. Smizik (D-Brookline) in introducing companion legislation that would allow patients with certain debilitating conditions safe and legal access to medical marijuana with a doctor’s recommendation and approval from the Department of Public Health. Legislators and medical marijuana patients across the state are preparing for a vote this legislative session.

“Fifteen other states now have medical marijuana laws on the books. It's time for us to take action on this quality of life issue once and for all,” said Smizik, lead sponsor of H. 625. “The bills that Senator Rosenberg and I have introduced include multiple levels of state regulation, such as state issued ID cards for qualifying patients and a rigorous licensing process that caps the amount of treatment centers that will open at nineteen.”

“There is no doubt that medical marijuana can help people with serious diseases who don't respond to existing medications,” agreed Rosenberg, lead sponsor of S. 1161. “The Rhode Island program that our proposals are modeled after includes the necessary controls to allow patients access to this medicine while preventing abuse of the system.” In an aggressive attempt to pass medical marijuana reform this session, legislative sponsors have filed the same bill in both the State Senate and House of Representatives.




Lorraine Kerz, a constituent of Sen. Rosenberg, recounted how medical marijuana helped her 29-year-old son Silas Bennett before he died of cancer. “After enduring chemotherapy treatments Silas would often be nauseous and unable to keep food down. After throwing up uncontrollably he would administer some medical marijuana. A few minutes later he'd say, 'OK mom, I'm ready to try again,'” she said. “Anyone who has seen how medical marijuana can help a family member suffering with cancer knows that passing this law is the right thing to do.”




“My body is being twisted from the uneven contractions of my muscles and my hands are balled into permanent fists. After medicating with marijuana my muscles are relaxed and pliable. Using medical marijuana is the difference between spending a comfortable day in my wheelchair or fighting with painful spasms throughout my body,” said Steve Saling from Chelsea, who has an advanced case of Lou Gehrig’s disease. “In my condition, what right does anyone have to deny me a safe and effective treatment? The decision to use medical marijuana or not should be made between patients and doctors.”

Both bills have been sent to the Joint Committee on Public Health for consideration and are awaiting a public hearing. The entire text of the House Bill can be read at: http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/House/H00625
The Senate Bill at: http://www.malegislature.gov/Bills/187/Senate/S01161

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Marijuana Arrests Spike in 2010



Posted by Dominic Holden on Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:00 PM

Put down that pipe and listen up, stoners!

Seattle police appear to be arresting more people this year on charges of possessing marijuana under Interim Chief John Diaz than under his predecessor, Gil Kerlikowske, who left his post in May 2009 to become the nation's Drug Czar. In fact, police are now arresting people for pot at the highest rate since voters passed a law in 2003 making marijuana possession the city's lowest law-enforcement priority.

Police arrested 88 people for marijuana possession from the beginning of January to the end of April and referred them for prosecution, according to records from the Seattle City Attorney's Office. During the same time frame last year, officers arrested only 52 people for marijuana possession.

Pete Holmes, the city attorney, has vowed not to prosecute any of those cases (except one case in which a defendant plead guilty to having pot and unlawfully using a weapon). But that hasn't stopped officers from arresting the suspects and referring their cases to Seattle Municipal Court.

At this rate, police will bust 264 people for marijuana possession by the end of 2010—more than double recent years. To compare: Police arrested 123 people for the offense in 2008 and 120 people in 2009.

Most of the people being busted are black (45 of the arrests), followed by white people (33 of the arrests), and the remaining 10 arrestees are other races.

According to the City Attorney's office records, 84 of the arrests were for marijuana only (only four of the cases included charges for another crime). This would suggest that arrest patterns for marijuana-law enforcement or marijuana use have changed drastically in Seattle; marijuana referrals from the SPD have historically resulted from the drug being found in association with another crime. But these data would suggest—and I question them—that police have practically stopped referring marijuana cases when associated with other crimes while increasing radically the marijuana-only arrest rate.

"We have had the opportunity to recheck the marijuana reports sent to our office, and the results were the same," Kevin Kilpatrick, an assistant city attorney supervisor who oversees records requests, said when asked to confirm the numbers. Last year only 28 people were arrested for marijuana-only offenses over the entire year (we've tripled that number in the first three months of 2010).

It also seems possible that police activity isn't responsible for the change, but rather the reporting by the Seattle City Attorney's office has changed (Holmes took over the office at the same time the data seem to change). Nonetheless, the city attorney's office insists its numbers are correct. Is the city reporting on pot cases now wrong? Was it wrong under Tom Carr? Have things just shifted drastically—and a police crackdown is underway on pot smokers? SPD said it would look into the matter. We're setting up a meeting with the city attorney's office to find out more.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Pot activist still in the joint: ‘It was all medical marijuana’


By Lincoln Anderson

Dana Beal would rather be smoking a joint — but he’s in the joint.

Bleecker St. marijuana activist Beal continues to sit in jail in Wisconsin after police arrested him and Lance Ramer of Omaha, Nebraska, on Jan. 6 with an alleged 186 pounds of pot in a car that Ramer was driving and in which Beal was a passenger.

Beal has been unable to make his $50,000 bail, though his lawyer has been fighting to get the amount reduced. Bail bondsmen — who take a 10 percent payment to post bond — aren’t allowed in Wisconsin.

According to a source, Beal’s Wisconsin case probably won’t go to trial until May. A leader of the Yippie movement and a pot activist since the 1960’s, Beal also faces similar charges in a 2009 Nebraska case, when he was arrested with 150 pounds of marijuana in a vehicle he was riding in. That case could go to trial this month, the source said.

Beal last year told this newspaper that the weed in the Nebraska arrest was acquired in California, and that he was planning to deliver it to medical marijuana buyers’ clubs in Michigan and New York City.

He currently reportedly faces up to seven-and-a-half years in jail.

In the meantime, as he passes the time imprisoned, Beal is, well, being Beal. A passionate advocate of ibogaine — which he touts as a miracle cure for heroin addiction — Beal reportedly has heard that the son of the judge on his case might have a heroin problem, and if so, could benefit from treatment with the African-plant-derived drug.

“He’s driving his lawyer crazy talking about ibogaine,” said Paul DiRienzo, a former WBAI radio reporter and friend of Beal’s. “He thinks ibogaine might be useful for the judge’s son if he’s on heroin — now he can offer the judge’s son a cure for heroin. He would be willing to do ibogaine with him,” as in monitor the man’s dosing with the powerful drug.

Beal is also said to be giving advice to a man in a cell across from him detoxing from dope.

DiRienzo noted the judge on the Wisconsin case, William Dyke, is “a very conservative judge — he was the mayor of Madison in the ’60’s when they were beating up protesters.” In 1976, Dyke was the vice-presidential running mate of Lester Maddox, a staunch segregationist, in his bid for the U.S. presidency.

DiRienzo spoke to this newspaper last week a few days after having had a 20-mintue conversation with Beal and his lawyer, Bryon Walker. The calls are expensive for Beal, and Aron Kay, a.k.a. “The Yippie Pie Man,” has been raising money to pay for Beal’s daily phone calls and other jailhouse expenses.

DiRienzo said the hope is that the authorities will just release Beal and possibly only make him pay a fine. He said Walker will argue that, at this point, Beal simply can’t be rehabilitated, prison’s purported purpose.

“‘Why spend the time and money rehabilitating a 64-year-old pothead who’s never going to change?’ That’s what the lawyer said to me,” DiRienzo reported.

Beal, during the conversation, also complained that the guards aren’t letting him take food back to his cell. DiRienzo said Beal has always suffered from insomnia, and likes to eat small portions throughout the night. Not being allowed to do so is worsening his insomnia, DiRienzo said, plus, as a result, “he’s not getting roughage.”

DiRienzo said he couldn’t go into the case’s specifics.

“I don’t know what happened,” he said. “According to his lawyer, he’s innocent.”

“I’m not at liberty to talk about the case,” added Kay. “He’s being victimized by neo-nazis who don’t like marijuana, in general.”

People who want to send money to Beal, can do it by PayPal, via pieman@pieman.org, he said. There’s also a Facebook page, “Free Dana Beal Free Ourselves,” with more information on how to send cash to Beal. In addition to phone calls, the money allows Beal to pay for juices, sweets and the like.

While locked up in Wisconsin, Beal obviously won’t be able to organize the Global Marijuana March (a.k.a. The Million Marijuana March) on Sat., May 7, as he has done for years.

“We’re going to pull it together, one way or another,” assured Kay. “Nothing will stop it.”

Another Yippie source said, “Someone in Portland is picking up the slack.”

The pot march occurs in cities around the world. Organizers for this year’s New York event are reportedly seeking a permit to march from Washington Square Park to Battery Park City.

If there’s an upside to his time in jail, Beal at least gets to watch four TV news channels there, noted the Yippie source, adding, “That’s more than he gets at 9 Bleecker St.” During the Super Bowl, Beal reportedly was telling his prison mates to pipe down, oblivious to the fact that the Packers’ playing in the game was an event of historic proportions in Wisconsin.

Beal’s arrest was also big news at least in part of the “Badger State,” in Iowa County, 10 miles outside Madison. According to a Jan. 14 article in the Dodgeville Chronicle (“Barneveld police make huge drug bust”), on Jan. 6 a police officer stopped the vehicle Beal was in because it had a broken taillight and some expired registration plates. Initially, Police Officer Nick Zimpel was prepared to issue just a warning, “perhaps a citation,” but he said, “I approached the vehicle and could smell an odor of marijuana coming, and at that time, I called for backup.” Ava, a K-9 police dog, was called in and, not surprisingly, immediately “hit on the vehicle.” Officers subsequently found a duffel bag with a “brick” of marijuana, with the whole haul of pot having a street value of more than $750,000.

A follow-up Dodgeville Chronicle article on Jan. 21 (“Who really is Irvin Dana Beal?”) stated, “Federal investigators are being careful with what information is released [about Beal’s case]. They feel it could compromise an investigation into a national drug ring which runs from California to New York with multiple locations.”

However, to hear Beal tell it, while he does admittedly transport cannabis cross-country, it’s marijuana for medical purposes. He calls people like himself “angels” for bringing pot to those who need it, and says it’s a crime to prosecute them for doing so.

Speaking last year, referring to his October 2009 Nebraska bust, Beal told this newspaper, “I’m just really offended by these a—holes in Nebraska saying it’s not all medical marijuana.” That is: that all the pot in the car was going to be used for medical purposes.

He’s been a medical marijuana advocate for more than two decades. He showed a New York newspaper article from the 1980’s, with a photo of him walking down the street, with a satchel over his shoulder, on his way to make a health-related reefer delivery.

Last July, Beal and medical marijuana advocates gathered on the City Hall steps in Lower Manhattan for a press conference to condemn comments made by Bridget Brennan, the New York special narcotics prosecutor, against a perennially pending bill to legalize medical marijuana here. Last year, advocates had hoped the bill finally had a chance to pass.

Those at the rally included AIDS sufferers, who said pot restored their appetites and kept them from wasting away; and a woman with M.S. and another, a survivor of third-stage breast cancer, who said marijuana eased the pain they felt from their afflictions and, in the case, of the woman who had fought cancer, painful radiation treatments.

Basically, Beal said, he supplied pot to medical marijuana buyers’ clubs, not only in New York, but also in other places, like Michigan.

“Three-and-a-half clubs [in New York] are connected to me,” he said. Beal said he supplied the clubs twice weekly, at locations in Manhattan and “the Village,” but didn’t want to get more specific. “They’re based on Tupperware parties,” he said. “More than 400 people in New York City are in some kind of [medical marijuana] club.”

At the press conference, he stated, “Medical marijuana is well established here and won’t be affected if I go to jail — except it might cost a little more. I was keeping the cost down.”

Beal said he likes to buy pot in California because it’s less expensive, adding, “I prefer stuff that’s grown outdoors. I prefer stuff that’s strong.” People with health needs need strong pot in order to benefit from the maximum medical effect, he explained. Beal noted he has to get the pot cross-country quickly, or it will start to “self-combust,” due to the volatile oils in it.

Told this, Special Narcotics Prosecutor Brennan scoffed that it sounded like “Cheech and Chong.” In an interview, Brennan charged that medical marijuana users mainly covet “the big bang to the head” that pot provides. Among other things, she said marijuana should first be removed from Schedule 1 of the Controlled Substances Act, allowing it to be tested for medical properties by federal researchers, only after which it could potentially be legalized for medical use.

At the end of the City Hall press conference last July, Beal asked everyone to hold up their “Cannabis Patients Registry” cards — but no one did.

“That was embarrassing — everybody forgot to bring their cards,” he said.

Later, he said he realized they were afraid to show their cards because they were out of date. He prints them up and laminates them at the Yippie Cafe, where he lives, at 9 Bleecker St. in Noho. The card’s front includes the person’s photo, while the back lists his or her medical condition and special needs.

As the Dodgeville Chronicle noted, Beal isn’t unknown in Wisconsin, where he first appeared more than 40 years ago as a leader of Yippie protests against the Vietnam War.

In fact, DiRienzo said, he met both Beal and Kay in Madison, which was known for its radicalism — “more radical than Berkeley,” he noted. While he was a student at Madison, DiRienzo said he met Beal during a conference about the 1980’s, where Beal argued with the organizer and took over the event. DiRienzo said he first made the acquaintance of “The Yippie Pie Man” when Kay pied Madison’s mayor.

DiRienzo said, if he has to make a choice, Beal would prefer to serve time in Wisconsin since it’s an “intellectual state,” whereas, in Nebraska, “they don’t like New Yorkers.”

A month after the press conference, Beal stopped by this newspaper’s office to introduce John Pylka, who was visiting from Washington, D.C. Pylka is a member there of the Cannabis Patients Registry, a medical marijuana buyers’ club, for which Beal said he supplied pot.

At one point, Pylka unfolded and held out a small Tibetan compassion flag (actually, a series of small flags tied together on a string), then said, “It takes a lot of guts to do this. We wouldn’t be doing this if the federal government allowed this.”

“See,” Beal said later, as they were leaving through the door, “there really is an East Coast medical marijuana network.”

#

medicinesocks [Moderator] 4 hours ago
Who belongs in jail? Rapists? Murderers? Violent criminals? How about OCD or PTSD sufferers or alcoholics or cat hoarders for that matter, do they belong in jail for using medical marijuana? There's a preponderance of anecdotal evidence coming from many millions of people who, though they're generally otherwise law abiding, break the law routinely at significant risk of losing their personal freedoms, because they suffer from various physical, behavioral and/or mental health disorders that they find medical marijuana can safely and effectively ease. Prohibition once again has made us a nation of scofflaws, divided and at war against ourselves, cops vs citizens, targeting the most vulnerable, the poorest,most disenfanchised young people of color most significantly. Prohibition policies cannot effectively stop the growth of huge illegal industries, as long as the public wants a product in significant quantities the economic law of supply and demand trumps any amount of money and manpower wasted on trying to eradicate a thriving black market. We must consider temperance, which is to say not a law of abstinence, but one of regulation and reasonable moderation and revenue as an alternative to the violence and crime that prohibitive rather than temperate regulatory policies engender.
Marijuana plant derived compounds have been shown to shrink cancer tumors, smoking high cbd strains helps chronic pain sufferers like myself regain a dignity and quality of life, retaining a presence of mind other meds would eradicate. The benefits outweigh the risks by so much that even healthy users can enjoy it at the end of the day with little if any ill effect. If you try it and don't like the effect, it is easy to put down and you'll never be tempted to use it again. Coffee is more habit forming. Smoking pot's a less pernicious habit than watching TV. More research is needed, but we already know it can also ease the anguish of medical users when dealing with the ignorant prejudices of evil, judgmental Babylonian @$$holes who think patients should have no right to informed consent and who would rather see us all behind bars for using a botanical remedy than actually look at the science and political history of this extremely useful and versatile plant.


aron pieman kay [Moderator] 12 hours ago
the revolution will deal with the neo-nazi enemies of medical marijuana
Flag
Like Reply Reply
#

aron pieman kay [Moderator] 12 hours ago
free our brother dana beal!!!! don't withhold the medicine

UMass professor drops bid to grow medical pot


March 4, 2011
AP- UMass professor drops bid to grow medical pot

WASHINGTON (AP) A University of Massachusetts-Amherst professor says he's dropping his nearly decade-long fight to persuade the government to let him grow marijuana in bulk for medical research.

Horticulturist Lyle Craker wanted to cultivate marijuana to boost research into the plant's potential medicinal benefits. But he's been rebuffed even as more than a dozen states have legalized medical marijuana.

Craker, 70, said he saw no end in sight to the legal wrangling, given the likelihood of an appeals process that could run several years, or even decades. He was frustrated, too, that he never got a hoped-for boost from the Obama administration.

"I'm disappointed in our system," he said. "But I'm not disappointed at what we did. I think our efforts have brought the problem to the public eye more. ... This is just the first battle in a war."

Craker, who said he has never smoked marijuana, launched his challenge to the government's monopoly on growing and distributing research marijuana in 2001. A lab at the University of Mississippi is the government's only marijuana-growing facility.

Craker contends that the government-grown pot lacks the potency medical researchers need for breakthroughs. He said there isn't enough of the drug freely available for scientists across the country.

"I'm disappointed mostly because of all the patients who could potentially benefit," he said.

The Drug Enforcement Administration has blocked Craker and defended the government's marijuana, saying its Mississippi facility provides the necessary quality and quantity for legitimate researchers. The DEA has said permitting other marijuana growers would lead to greater illegal use of the drug.

Craker won a key victory in 2007 when a federal administrative law judge recommended to the DEA that it grant Craker's application to grow marijuana in bulk for use by scientists in government-approved research. In a nonbinding ruling, the judge said the government's supply was inadequate for medical research.

But the DEA ruled against Craker in January 2009 in the waning days of the Bush administration. Craker hoped Obama administration officials would view his case more favorably, but his motion for the DEA to reconsider his case has languished.

Craker and his attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union decided to drop their case.

Craker said he's puzzled why the Obama administration has eased its policy toward states on medical marijuana but won't reconsider his request.

"All we want to do is to produce the material that medical doctors want to use for tests," he said.

Marijuana is still illegal under federal law. In a move that energized the medical marijuana movement, the Obama administration has said it won't target medical marijuana patients or caregivers as long as they comply with state laws and aren't fronts for drug traffickers.

Fifteen states and the District of Columbia allow medical marijuana.

In California, the state's landmark 1996 medical marijuana law allows users only to grow pot for themselves or obtain it from a designated primary caregiver.

Pot dispensaries in California have operated largely free from interference by having users designate the dispensary as their primary caregiver.

Craker has said much more research is needed to determine which types of marijuana can be medically beneficial and how the drug should be used.

"It would be nice to be able to develop plant material that would be specific for glaucoma, specific to inhibit vomiting and all those other things that the plant is credited with doing," he said. "Currently, people with ailments are taking pot shots or they are going to illegal sources, which I suspect most of them are."

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Bill S00818 By Mr. McGee


Nice of them to uphold one's doctor's authority to recommend mj treatment for ailments not iterated here rather than ceding decisions about a patient's care to a sketchy and skeptical state department, I wish Smizik's bill did that. Smizik's bill allows for 24 plants and 4 usable oz. This bill only allows for 10 plants and that seems a precipitous loss. There are other pieces here I find problematic but I'll give the whole thing a more careful read and review soon. These were the first couple of things things that jumped out at me.

Also, that this is a second bill in the senate, not filed under the same name as the other two, so it will get a separate committee and hearing?

Why can't we synthesize the best of all possible bills by striking the unnecessarily prohibitive language from both, keeping what's great about Smizik's and including the enlightened stipulation included here, of upholding the doctors' authority to recommend treatment for patients without state intervention in that confidential practice?


Bill S00818 By Mr. McGee, petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 818) of Jehlen, Creem, Tolman and other members of the Senate for legislation relative to the arrest and prosecution for the possession of marijuana for medical purposes [Joint Committee on the Judiciary].

Sponsors: Thomas McGee


Petitioners: Thomas McGee, Steven Tolman, Cynthia Creem, Patricia Jehlen


SECTION 1. Section 34 of Chapter 94C of the General Laws as appearing in the 1998 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking the fourth paragraph thereof and inserting the following:— It shall be a prima facie defense to a charge of possession, manufacturing or trafficking of marihuana under this section if the defendant is a patient, caregiver or physician under the definitions and pursuant to the conditions set out in chapter ninety-four D. Police officers shall have the right to exercise judgment in determining whether or not to arrest an individual if there is evidence that marihuana possession, manufacturing or trafficking falls under the exception set out in this section or in chapter ninety-four D.

SECTION 2. Section 1 of Chapter 94D of the General Laws as appearing in the 1998 Official Edition, is hereby amended by including the following:— “Debilitating Medical Condition”, means a chronic or debilitating disease, medical condition or treatment that produces one or more of the following: cachexia or wasting syndrome, chronic or severe pain, severe nausea, seizures, severe and persistent muscle spasms, or any other condition or its treatment approved by a patient’s doctor in the exercise of his professional judgment.

“Medical use”, means the acquisition, possession, cultivation, manufacture, use, delivery, transfer, or transportation of marihuana or paraphernalia relating to the consumption of marihuana to alleviate the symptoms or effects of a qualifying patient’s debilitating medical condition.

“Personal medical use”, is an amount of marihuana that is not more than is reasonably necessary to ensure the uninterrupted availability of marihuana, for the purpose of alleviating the symptoms or effects of a patient’s medical condition for which he or she has been recommended to use marihuana, and shall be presumed to be not more than four ounces of dried, useable, marihuana, and no more than ten plants, four of which can be mature (flowering).

“Primary caregiver”, means a person who is at least eighteen (18) years old, who has

never been convicted of a felony drug offense, and who has agreed not to provide marihuana to any person other than qualifying patients and who is given a written designation of their caregiver status. A qualifying patient may have only one primary caregiver at any one time.

“Qualifying patient”, means a person who has been diagnosed by a licensed physician as having a debilitating medical condition.

“Usable marihuana”, means the dried leaves and flowers of marihuana, and any mixture or preparation thereof, and does not include the seeds, stalks, and roots of the plant.

“Written recommendation” means the qualifying patient’s medical records, or a statement signed by a physician, stating that in the physician’s professional opinion, after having completed a full assessment of the qualifying patient’s medical history and current medical condition made in the course of a bona fide physician-patient relationship, the qualifying patient has a debilitating medical condition and the potential benefits of the medical use of marihuana would likely outweigh the health risks for the qualifying patient.

SECTION 3. Said chapter 94D is amended by adding the following new section:—

Chapter 94D: Section 4 Private Recommendation of Marihuana

Section 4

A. Protections for the medical use of marihuana.

(i) A qualifying patient who has in his possession a written recommendation shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or penalty in any manner, or denied any right or privilege, including civil penalty or disciplinary action by a professional licensing board, for the medical use of marihuana; provided, that the qualifying patient possesses personal medical use amounts.

(ii) Subsection (i) of this section shall not apply to a qualifying patient under the age of eighteen (18) years, unless:

(a) The qualifying patient’s physician has explained the potential risks and benefits of the medical use of marihuana to the qualifying patient and to a parent, guardian, or person having legal custody of the qualifying patient; and

(b) A parent, guardian, or person having legal custody consents in writing to:

(1) allow the qualifying patient’s medical use of marihuana;

(2) serve as the qualifying patient’s primary caregiver; and

(3) control the acquisition of the marihuana, the dosage, and the frequency of the medical use of marihuana by the qualifying patient.

(iii) A primary caregiver who has in his or her possession a written recommendation and a designation of caregiver statement shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or penalty in any manner, or denied any right or privilege, including civil penalty or disciplinary action by a professional licensing board, for assisting the qualifying patient to whom he is connected; provided, that the primary caregiver possesses personal medical use amounts.

(iv) There shall exist a presumption that a qualifying patient or primary caregiver is engaged in the medical use of marihuana if the qualifying patient or primary caregiver:

(a) is in possession of a written recommendation; and

(b) is in possession of personal medical use amounts. Such presumption may be rebutted by evidence that conduct related to marihuana was not for the purpose of alleviating the symptoms or effects of a qualifying patient’s debilitating medical condition.

(v) A physician shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or penalty in any manner, or denied any right or privilege, including civil penalty or disciplinary action by the Massachusetts Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline, for providing written recommendation for the medical use of marihuana to qualifying patients.

(vi) Any interest in or right to property that is possessed, owned, or used in connection with the medical use of marihuana, or acts incidental to such use, shall not be forfeited.

(vii) No person shall be subject to arrest or prosecution for “constructive possession,” “conspiracy,” or any other offense for simply being in the presence or vicinity of the medical use of marihuana as permitted under this chapter.

(viii) A written recommendation, a registry identification card, or equivalent, issued by another state government to permit the medical use of marihuana by a qualifying patient, or to permit a person to assist with a qualifying patient’s medical use of marihuana, shall have the same force of effect as a registry identification card issued by the department.

B. This chapter shall not permit

(i) any person to operate, navigate, or be in actual physical control of any motor vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat while under the influence of marihuana; and

(ii) the smoking of marihuana:

(a) in a school bus or other form of public transportation;

(b) on any school grounds;

(c) in any correctional facility; or

(d) at any public park, public beach, public recreation center, or youth center.

C. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require:

(i) a government medical assistance program or private health insurer to reimburse a person for costs associated with the medical use of marihuana; or

(ii) an employer to accommodate the medical use of marihuana in any workplace.

D. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, fraudulent representation to a law enforcement official of any fact or circumstance relating to the medical use of marihuana to avoid arrest or prosecution shall be punishable by a fine of five hundred dollars ($500) which shall be in addition to any other penalties that may apply for the non-medical use of marihuana.

E. Affirmative defense.

(i) A person and a person’s primary caregiver, if any, may assert the medical use of marihuana as a defense to any prosecution involving marihuana, and such defense shall be presumed valid where the evidence shows that:

(a) the person’s medical records indicate, or a physician has stated that, in the physician’s professional opinion, after having completed a full assessment of the person’s medical history and current medical condition made in the course of a bona fide physician-patient relationship, the potential benefits of the medical use of marihuana would likely outweigh the health risks for the person; and

(b) the person and the person’s primary caregiver, if any, were collectively in possession of a quantity of marihuana in excess of what is defined as personal medical use amounts in this section.

F. Repealer.

All laws and parts of laws in Massachusetts that are in conflict with this chapter are hereby repealed.

G. Severability.

Any part of this section of this chapter being held invalid as to any person or circumstances shall not affect the application of any other section of this chapter that can be given full effect without the invalid section or application.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Pressure grows to legalize medical pot


18 distribution centers eyed in Bay State

By Christine McConville and Dave Wedge | Tuesday, March 1, 2011 |
http://www.bostonherald.com | Local Coverage
Photo

Pot “Wal-Marts” like those planned for California and other states could
throw open their doors in the Bay State, as momentum builds for the
legalization of medical marijuana.

Two years after Massachusetts decriminalized possession of small amounts
of pot, a bill pending on Beacon Hill would allow prescriptions for
medical marijuana and set up 18 distribution centers across Massachusetts.

“Since the 1930s, we’ve been fighting marijuana as the killer weed, and
that has to stop,” said state Rep. Frank I. Smizik, a Brookline Democrat
championing the bipartisan bill. “There are so many people suffering
with serious diseases where marijuana is the only way to stop the pain
and keep them going.”

Similar legislation is in place in Vermont and Rhode Island, where
cancer and other chronically ill patients can buy reefer. Maine, which
has allowed prescription weed for 12 years, is in the process of
licensing eight dispensaries.

Meanwhile, a 10,000-square- foot gardening emporium, described in news
reports as “the Wal-Mart of weed, just opened in Sacramento, offering
experts and merchandise to help medical marijuana patients grow their
own pot.

But even as the movement grows, some states are pulling back on their
own medical marijuana laws amid spiking crime. The Montana House
recently voted to repeal the state’s six-year-old medical marijuana law
and in Colorado, seven towns have shut down dispensaries.

“We’ve had home invasions, and robberies and rip-offs of the people in
the underground-growing business,” said Fort Collins, Colo. police Capt.
Jerry Schiager. “The problem is it is so profitable, and the criminal
element is so anxious to get in here and exploit this market, you have
to be very careful.”

The Bay State proposal could be a money-maker for the commonwealth,
Smizik said, as distribution centers will have to pay licensing fees of
$5,000. And, he argues, it will also cut down on street crime as at
least a portion of sales will be regulated by the state.

“A lot of medicines (patients) get, like OxyContin, are pretty dangerous
... Marijuana is the only thing that lets them function, and people have
to go out on the street to buy it,” Smizik said.

The time is ripe for a “discussion” about legalizing medical marijuana
in the Bay State, agreed state Rep. Daniel Winslow, a Wrentham
Republican and former judge who noted a nonbinding referendum on the
issue passed “overwhelmingly” in his district in the 2010 election.

Article URL:
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1320136

Monday, February 28, 2011

Gateway Theory Debunked … Again! An Aussie blogger reads the studies and rants about propaganda vs science based pot policy Down Under


Sunday, 5 September 2010

New research finds little support for the hypothesis that marijuana is a "gateway" drug leading to the use of harder drugs in adulthood.
--WebMD Medical Reference

You have to feel sorry for people who have learning difficulties. Especially those who bang on and on and on about cannabis being a “gateway” to harder drugs.

It seems that no amount of evidence will stop over zealous, dip-shit anti-drug pundits from spreading their lies and propaganda. Not even those pesky scientists who keep proving them wrong, will keep them quiet.

I wonder what their response will be to the latest study by researchers at the University of New Hampshire who once again disproved “The Gateway Theory”? Somehow I doubt if we will hear much about it. When was the last time you heard a politician or anti-drug group declare they were wrong or the “The Gateway Theory” is obsolete? When was the last time you read about it in the mainstream media?

So, why do they persist? Most people or groups who constantly reject medical research and scientific evidence are usually just written off as nutters but some of these zealots will go to great lengths in a desperate attempt to push their disingenuous cause. Even to the point of using junk science. For example:

In contrast, the US Office of National Drug Control Policy’s “2008 Marijuana Sourcebook” clearly states that recent research supports the gateway hypothesis, specifically that “its use creates greater risk of abuse or dependency on other drugs, such as heroin and cocaine”.
--Drug Free Australia (DFA): Cannabis – Suicide, Schizophrenia And Other Ill-Effects (March 2009)

Of course, the US Office of National Drug Control Policy aka The Drug Czar is notorious for dishing up government sponsored propaganda. Remember, this is the group that manages the "War on Drugs" for the US and the UN. Maybe if they spent more time reading up on the available scientific evidence instead of sifting through volumes of anti-drug propaganda they would come to a different conclusion. Nah, who am I kidding?

It is hard to keep the same attitudes to cannabis prohibition when Obama and the two previous US Presidents are known to have smoked cannabis. Perhaps cannabis is a gateway drug after all * the drug that young Americans have to try if they want to become President of the USA.
--Dr. Alex Wodak - Director of the Alcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent’s Hospital

Ironically, there is some truth about cannabis leading to harder drugs but not for the reasons quoted by the gateway theory supporters. It’s actually the policies pushed by these supporters that are to blame. Simply smoking cannabis doesn’t make someone automatically want something stronger or harder. It’s the association with drug dealers that smokers are forced to endure because of our strict drug laws. Some of these dealers will undoubtedly sell harder drugs, giving way to pressure to try another drug. Pot smokers are forced underground where all drug users are grouped together by a society that doesn’t separate soft drugs from hard drugs. Most pot smokers never go on to harder drugs nor do they want to but being forced underground with addicts, criminals and speed dealers exposes them to a world that they normally wouldn’t encounter.


Teen Pot Smoking Won't Lead to Other Drugs as Adults
Study Shows Marijuana Isn't a 'Gateway' to Other Drugs as Teens Turn Into Adults
WebMD Medical Reference
By Salynn Boyles. Reviewed by Laura J. Martin, MD
September 2010

New research finds little support for the hypothesis that marijuana is a "gateway" drug leading to the use of harder drugs in adulthood.

Teens in the study who smoked marijuana were more likely to go on to use harder illicit drugs, but the gateway effect was lessened by the age of 21, investigators say.

Harder drugs in the study referred to illicit drugs that include analgesics, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, sedatives, stimulants, and tranquilizers.

The study is published in the September issue of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior.

Failure to graduate from high school or find a job were all bigger predictors of drug use in young adulthood than marijuana use during adolescence, says study researcher Karen Van Gundy, who is a sociologist at the University of New Hampshire.

She adds that the findings have implications for policymakers on the front lines in the war on drugs.

"If we overly criminalize behaviors like marijuana use among teens, this could interfere with opportunities for education and employment later on, which, in turn, could be creating more drug use," she tells WebMD.

Marijuana's Gateway Effect Goes Away
Van Gundy says she did not set out to disprove the idea that marijuana is a gateway drug when she and co-researcher Cesar J. Rebellon examined survey data from 1,300 mostly male Hispanic, white, and African-American young adults who attended south Florida public schools in the 1990s. The participants were followed from enrollment in the sixth or seventh grade until they reached their late teens or early 20s.

"Most of the previous research has examined early drug use among people with serious drug problems," she says. "These people do tend to progress from alcohol and marijuana use to other drugs."

When the teens in the study were followed forward into young adulthood, however, a different picture emerged.

"We were somewhat surprised to find the gateway effect wasn't that strong during the transition to adulthood," Van Gundy says. "It really didn't matter if someone used marijuana or not as a teen."

Specifically, the study found illicit drug abuse in young adulthood to be much more closely linked to stress during the teen years and whether or not the young adults were employed.

"Assuming and occupying conventional roles, such as 'worker,' may close the marijuana gateway by modifying and redirecting substance use trajectories," the researchers write.

The Fight Against Drugs
The findings suggest anti-drug efforts aimed at keeping kids in school and providing employment opportunities may have the biggest positive impact on drug use in adulthood, Van Gundy says.

Urban sociologist and drug-use researcher Lesley Reid agrees.

An associate professor of sociology at Georgia State University in Atlanta, Reid's research has focused on the gateway effect of so-called club drugs like ecstasy and cocaine among heavy drug users in their 20s.

She says most of these heavy users do start with alcohol and marijuana and progress to harder drugs.

"Obviously, we don't see this age effect among these heavy users," she tells WebMD. "But in the general population most people do outgrow behaviors like drug use and other delinquent behaviors."

'Gateway' Pioneer Critical of Study
But Columbia University sociologist Denise B. Kandel, PhD, whose research early in the decade found marijuana to be a gateway drug, calls the new research highly flawed and the conclusions "ill founded."

She tells WebMD that the design of the study did not allow the researchers to properly test the hypothesis that marijuana is a gateway drug.

Kandel does not disagree with the conclusion that social position in young adulthood plays a big role in drug use during this time. But she says the researchers fail to consider the potential impact of early marijuana use on social position.

"Using marijuana as a teen can certainly have an impact on whether or not someone fails to graduate from high school or gets a job," she says. "And this increases the risk of persistent illicit drug use."

Study says marijuana no gateway drug


on December 4, 2006

Marijuana is not a “gateway” drug that predicts or eventually leads to substance abuse, suggests a 12-year University of Pittsburgh study. Moreover, the study’s findings call into question the long-held belief that has shaped prevention efforts and governmental policy for six decades and caused many a parent to panic upon discovering a bag of pot in their child’s bedroom.

The Pitt researchers tracked 214 boys beginning at ages 10-12, all of whom eventually used either legal or illegal drugs. When the boys reached age 22, they were categorized into three groups: those who used only alcohol or tobacco, those who started with alcohol and tobacco and then used marijuana (gateway sequence) and those who used marijuana prior to alcohol or tobacco (reverse sequence).

Nearly a quarter of the study population who used both legal and illegal drugs at some point – 28 boys – exhibited the reverse pattern of using marijuana prior to alcohol or tobacco, and those individuals were no more likely to develop a substance use disorder than those who followed the traditional succession of alcohol and tobacco before illegal drugs, according to the study, which appears in this month’s issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry.

“The gateway progression may be the most common pattern, but it’s certainly not the only order of drug use,” said Ralph E. Tarter, Ph.D., professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy and lead author of the study. “In fact, the reverse pattern is just as accurate for predicting who might be at risk for developing a drug dependence disorder.”

In addition to determining whether the gateway hypothesis was a better predictor of substance abuse than competing theories, the investigators sought to identify characteristics that distinguished users in the gateway sequence from those who took the reverse path. Out of the 35 variables they examined, only three emerged to be differentiating factors: Reverse pattern users were more likely to have lived in poor physical neighborhood environments, had more exposure to drugs in their neighborhoods and had less parental involvement as young children. Most importantly, a general inclination for deviance from sanctioned behaviors, which can become evident early in childhood, was strongly associated with all illicit drug use, whether it came in the gateway sequence, or the reverse.

While the gateway theory posits that each type of drug is associated with certain specific risk factors that cause the use of subsequent drugs, such as cigarettes or alcohol leading to marijuana, this study’s findings indicate that environmental aspects have stronger influence on which type of substance is used. That is, if it’s easier for a teen to get his hands on marijuana than beer, then he’ll be more likely to smoke pot. This evidence supports what’s known as the common liability model, an emerging theory that states the likelihood that someone will transition to the use of illegal drugs is determined not by the preceding use of a particular drug but instead by the user’s individual tendencies and environmental circumstances.

“The emphasis on the drugs themselves, rather than other, more important factors that shape a person’s behavior, has been detrimental to drug policy and prevention programs,” Dr. Tarter said. “To become more effective in our efforts to fight drug abuse, we should devote more attention to interventions that address these issues, particularly to parenting skills that shape the child’s behavior as well as peer and neighborhood environments.”

Indeed, according to the study, interventions focusing on behavior modification may be more effective prevention tactics than current anti-drug initiatives. For example, providing guidance to parents – particularly those in high-risk neighborhoods – on how to boost their caregiving skills and foster bonding with their children, could have a measurable effect on a child’s likelihood to smoke marijuana. Also, early identification of children who exhibit antisocial tendencies could allow for interventions before drug use even begins.

Although this research has significant implications for drug abuse prevention approaches, Dr. Tarter notes that the study has some limitations. First, as only male behaviors were studied, further investigation should explore if the results apply to women as well. Also, the examination of behaviors in phases beyond alcohol and marijuana consumption in the gateway series will be necessary.

From University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Notes from Dick Evans' presentation UMass CRC meeting 2/28/11


dupont is gm and other snippets of a great lesson in history and civics

Dick Evans gave a great talk tonight at the UMass CRC meeting about Prohibition and prohibition repeal in America. I love linguistics, and enjoyed the distinctions of punctuation with which Dick Evans opened his discussion of Prohibition, the historical period which began in 1920 and ended 13 years later, and prohibition, the policy. For those of us engaged in the current movement to repeal the prohibition of marijuana in Massachusetts, the lessons of the American experiment in alcohol prohibition, and especially in the under-reported story of how that prohibition got repealed can be quite instructive. Evans' lesson tonight gave us food for thought, much encouragement, and a framework upon which we may ensure a successful repetition of history, all for the good.

Here are some of the notes I took mentally as I listened to the presentation, wishing I'd brought my video camera. it has a better memory than I do but this is the best I can muster tonight:


rhetoric is not to be confused with verbosity
rhetoric is not propaganda

it is the studied use of language

medical-recreational not dichotomous issues there's a trilogy or perhaps further ways to use... expansively, as writers, musicians and artists' use to enhance creative process, or laborers who use it to get through tedious days of hard work .. sacramental use of course should be constitutionally protected?

the issue is not the substance, the issue is prohibition. should it be constitutionally banned? which side are you on?

identifying the polarity:wet vs dry was prohibition era divide, with some candidates dubbed amphibian or moist, damp, when wishy washy or in both camps. a paradigm for now? tolerant vs intolerant... hip vs square? redbud vs ragweed says n harsh vs mellow says i bumper sticker mentality? can it work? we ought to be softer on drugs *and* harder on crime

right to tax

stop arresting people

stop targeting people of color?

the law was originally based on racist discrimination and perpetrates racial targeting to this day

stress the futility

cession-- a state may cede enforcement to another sovereign entity (federal enforcement)

another way to repeal prohibition, constitutional amendment by state's votes, tried and true in the 1930's .in article V of the constitution it turns out that we the voters can pass a constitutional amendment by having constitutional conventions in 3/4 of the states, wherein all delegates get elected by voters in the state, and the voters can know which side of the new amendment each delegate will fall; so the voter wills elect a majority of either sensi or schwag delegates to the convention, thereby ensuring direct democratic representation

pauline sabin in pearls and the women's suffrage movement, new wave of activism building on the studied usage of the meaning of the word temperance, which suggests not prohibition, which creates a papradigm of rampant crime and other social issues, a model of greater tolerance for moderate appropriate use... after earlier suffragette temperance activism, carrie nation with a hatchet, etc extoll temperance

other factors that favored the repeal of the Big P were economic, the Great Depression, the need for new industry and revenue

it's a paragraph:

whether you like it or not m is part of our culture which no amount of money or enforcement will make go away

stop arresting people it's futile!

tax, regulate, DARE to teach accurate history, politics and science based information re marijuana vs BS scare tactic curricula, sends a message to youth, they deserve the truth

After current drug czar claims legalization is not in Obama's vocabulary, LEAP officer asks YouTube q and, "Legalization is on the table" says pres. O

time for a debate

Friday, February 25, 2011

The Latest Update from MPP


Last update: February 17, 2011

On Wednesday, January 5, the 2011-2012 Massachusetts legislative session officially began. Once again, the Marijuana Policy Project, along with Massachusetts Patient Advocacy Alliance, will be working tirelessly to ensure that seriously ill residents of the Bay State are afforded protection from arrest and prosecution for using medical marijuana. Please e-mail your legislators and ask them to support medical marijuana legislation.

Rep. Frank Smizik has once again introduced legislation, HB 625 , that would protect sick Bay Staters from arrest and prosecution for using medical marijuana if their doctor recommends it. In addition, we expect Senate President Pro Tem Stanley Rosenberg to introduce a companion bill in the Senate soon. Rep. Smizik and Sen. Rosenberg’s bill is very similar to the legislation that stalled in committee last session. Please take a moment to contact Speaker DeLeo to politely and respectfully ask that medical marijuana legislation receive a vote this year.

Medical marijuana legislation is not controversial. Rep. Smizik’s 2009-2010 medical marijuana bill gained support from, among many other organizations, the Massachusetts Bar Association, the Massachusetts Nurses Association, and the Massachusetts Public Health Association. To find out more about the proposed medical marijuana law, be sure to check out the Massachusetts Patient Advocacy Alliance's site.

Finally, if you are a patient with a serious medical condition who could benefit from medical marijuana, a loved one, a medical professional, or a member of law enforcement or the clergy who might be interested in speaking out, please contact the Massachusetts Patient Advocacy Alliance to see how you can be of special help in passing this legislation.

Marijuana possession citation law working well, despite continued attempts to weaken it

On November 4, 2008, Massachusetts became the first state to remove the possibility of jail time for simple marijuana possession by voter initiative. MPP’s campaign committee spearheaded this effort. Under the new law, possession of an ounce or less of marijuana is a civil infraction punishable only by a $100 fine and forfeiture of the marijuana.

During the 2009-2010 legislative session, despite the fact that the new law was overwhelmingly approved with 65% of the vote, several bills were introduced that sought to undermine Massachusetts' new marijuana possession law or otherwise increase the penalties associated with marijuana. Most of these bills were heard before the Joint Committee on the Judiciary in July 2009, but fortunately, none of them passed.

Unfortunately, Rep. Todd Smola has introduced two bills to increase marijuana possession penalties. One would further punish an individual in possession of marijuana while in a school zone and the other would increase the penalty associated with possession of marijuana while in operation of a motor vehicle. Please sign up for our free e-mail alerts to stay up-to-date on any hearings or votes scheduled for these misguided bills.

Marijuana Laws in Massachusetts

Although possession of under an ounce of marijuana is punishable by a civil fine of $100 in Massachusetts, the prohibition of marijuana has plenty of opportunity costs. Time spent enforcing marijuana laws could better be used to investigate and bring to justice perpetrators of violent crime. The clearance rate for murder in Massachusetts is 53.9%; for rape and burglary, the clearance rates are 27.8% and 23.8%, respectively. Please e-mail your legislators and ask them to consider a more sensible alternative. For more information on marijuana laws in Massachusetts, please see an in-depth report by Jon Gettman, PhD, about the current marijuana laws and policies in Massachusetts.

Stay connected

To stay updated on the status of marijuana policy reform in Massachusetts, be sure to subscribe to MPP's free legislative alert service.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Gary Johnson Speaks in Manchester NH tomorrow! Feb 25... and more

Terry writes, on wmdp listserve;

I have received this info third hand -- but since none of the folks involved have posted it here, I thought I'd better do so -- since the first event is tomorrow!

************************************************************


Interest Meeting Feb. 25 with a Special Guest Speaker

We’ll be holding an interest meeting at 1 p.m. Friday, Feb. 25, at Blake’s Restaurant on the west side of Manchester (353 South Main Street). If you are planning to testify at the public hearing, we would particularly like to have you attend. Appetizers will be provided at no cost, and all supporters of medical marijuana are invited.

Our guest speaker will be former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, a leading national critic of the War on Marijuana.

In other (related) news, our former executive director Matt Simon is now working for Gov. Johnson’s organization, and Matt will be attending our meeting as well. Gov. Johnson will speak to us at the beginning of the meeting, and then Matt and I will lead a discussion on how we can all prepare effective testimony for the hearing.

******

Hearing Scheduled for March 1

The much-anticipated [medical marijuana] bill has been introduced, and it has been assigned a number (HB 442 -- you can read it here if you’d like). A public hearing has been scheduled for March 1 at 10:00 a.m. in Room 205 of the Legislative Office Building in Concord (behind the golden-domed state house). Mark that date and time on your calendars!

If you can’t make it to the meeting but want to testify, or if you aren’t sure if you'd like to testify, please get in touch with me at kirk@nhcompassion.org

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

UConn Student Government endorses Governor Malloy's Marijuana Decriminalization Bill


The University of Connecticut Student Government passed a statement in support of Gov. Malloy's Marijuana Decriminalization Bill, SB 1014, with a wide majority, 30-1 on Wednesday night. The Undergraduate Student Government represents over 17,000 undergraduates, and endorsing a marijuana reform bill is a rare move by a student government. UConn Students for Sensible Drug Policy President and Student Government senator Sam Tracy lead the effort with 15 other co-sponsors.

"It is amazing to see that the representatives from such a diverse number of backgrounds could come together to nearly unanimously endorse marijuana reform, something that was pretty controversial only a few years ago. I look forward to helping Gov. Malloy and the General Assembly in finally implenting this common-sense policy that will save our state millions in these tough budget times." Said Sam Tracy UConn SSDP President and USG Senator.

The near-unanimous passage of this bill further illustrates a changing tone in the Connecticut public opinion on marijuana reform. With the recent courageous step by Gov. Malloy to make drug policy reform a high priority, CT is setting itself up for a major shift toward more responsible drug policies. The bill mentioned many poignant recent figures and studies concerning the issue, such as the fact that 444 students were arrested for drug possession on UConn's campus in the past three years. They also noted that the state could save taxpayers over $30 million a year by making possession of small amounts of marijuana an infraction rather than a misdemeanor, according to the nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis. Due to the Aid Elimination Provision of the Higher Education Act of 1965, a drug conviction can bar a student from receiving federal financial aid, while other crimes, even murder, do not. Over 2,000 CT students have been denied federal aid due to drug convictions.

The students plan to present this endorsement to the state legislature in the near future.


--
Sam Tracy

President, Students for Sensible Drug Policy (UConn chapter)
Senator, USG (Undergraduate Student Government)

Another Study Confirms Anti-Cancer Effects of THC and CBD


Posted by Daily Dose on February 16, 2011 at 4:06 pm
Categories: CBD (cannabidiol), Cancer, Cannabinoid System, Cannabis Science, Health News, Medical Marijuana, Pharmaceuticals, Project CBD, THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol)

By Jahan Marcu | Published in Examiner.com

THC and TMZ decrease tumor size

Over the last decade there have been numerous publications demonstrating the anti-cancer effects of plant and synthetic cannabinoids. Notably, the main ingredient of Cannabis, THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), has demonstrated the ability to kill multiple types of cancers in a variety of cancer research models. CBD (cannabidiol), another common plant component, has also shown the ability to kill cancer cells, recently it has been used to successfully treat breast cancer in a mouse research model of the disease.

Certain types of brain cancer appear to be vulnerable to cannabinoids such as THC and CBD. Scientific research has demonstrated that THC and other cannabinoids can kill extremely aggressive brain cancers known as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) or grade IV astrocytomas. Researchers have also experimented with combining different cananbinoids for the treatment of aggressive brain cancers. So far, the results have been extremely promising. There is a need for new treatments for GBMs, as current treatments for these cancers can extend life for up to 15 months, if you’re lucky.

Last year, the journal of Molecular Cancer Therapeutics published research demonstrating that combination’s of THC and CBD, the two most abundant cannabinoids on the plant, can lead to a greater-than-additive or synergistic inhibition of cancer growth. Now, nearly a year to the date, the journal has published another article studying the anti-cancer effects of THC and CBD. The new article takes the next steps towards getting this therapy in to the clinic by testing THC and CBD in animals along side a common brain tumor drug TMZ (temozolomide).

The study was conducted in Spain, and the experiments analyzing the effects of cannabinoids were conducted with tumors or brain cancer cells from human samples and a tumor xenograft mouse model. A tumor xenograft model is basically a cancer that is induced into an animal that has a compromised immune system. This allows researchers to give a mouse a tumor consisting of human cells, thus a promising anti-cancer treatment can be tested on a human tumor in a more natural environment, than a petri dish.

The plant cannabinoids used for this study were “kindly provided by GW pharmaceuticals.” THC and CBD were also provided as plant extracts or “botanical drug substances,” meaning they contained small amounts of other cannabinoids. Allowing these researchers to construct a custom anti-cancer, Sativex-like substance. Other synthetic cannabinoids such as SR141716A and SR144528 were donated by Sonafi-Aventis.

In the figure provided it shows that THC and TMZ can drastically inhibit the size of tumor. The pictures on the graph are of tumors after 15 days of treatment.

In other experiments the authors also examined combinations of THC,CBD, TMZ , and SAT-L (a “botonical drug substance” or extract containing a 1:1 ratio of THC and CBD, 7.5mg each). Interestingly their results also showed that TMZ resistant cells, can be killed by cannabinoids or in combination with cannabinoids.

The researchers conclude that:

“Taken together, our observations support that the administration of cannabinoids, and in particular of Sativex, which is currently used for palliative applications in patients with cancer and multiple sclerosis, alone or in combination with TMZ, could be of potential interest for the management of GBM.”

Cannabis-based medicines are most often prescribed to increase quality of life or treat symptoms of disease. As research continues on this ancient medicine, scientific data suggests that cannabinoids are not only promising treatments but represent potential cures.

Continue reading on Examiner.com: Another Study Confirms Anti-Cancer Effects of THC and CBD – Philadelphia medical marijuana | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/medical-marijuana-in-philadelphia/another-study-confirms-anti-cancer-effects-of-thc-and-cbd-1#ixzz1EAa0ZKNX

ANOTHER DREAM JOB FOR MaMaMoJo (Except the heavy lifting!)


Medical Cannabis Member Services Representative
APPLY NOW
Company : Buds and Roses Collective Position : Full Time
Location : California / Los Angeles Experience : 0-2 Yrs
Category : Sales / Biz Development / Medical Salary : Will be discussed at the end of screening process (not before)
Visa sponsorship : No
Tags: Marijuana , budtender , cannabis , customer service , sales , medical

We are actively recruiting for at least one position right now and may have other opportunities shortly. If you are interested in being considered for this position, please read the post thoroughly and follow all instructions.

The ideal candidate for this job will have to be able to follow written instructions to do this job well. And we are assessing candidates' ability to follow written instruction based off their responses.

We are asking that each applicant provide a cover letter which 1) explains why applicant wants to work at our medical marijuana collective; 2) what resources the applicant can bring to our collective; and, 3) what value the applicant can add to our collective.

If your cover letter doesn't address those 3 specific topics, then we'll assume you weren't really that interested in the position.

We also would like 3-5 personal and professional references.

We will be taking our time to find the perfect candidate. There will be a long screening process with a thorough background check. We will be assessing your skills with a variety of evaluations.

Title of the position
Member Services Representative

Department
Showroom Floor

Reports to
Executive Director and other members

Overall responsibility
Interface with all levels of collective members regarding showroom floor activities and tasks.

Key areas of responsibility
• Ensure member satisfaction on a continuous basis
• Assist members with their decisions and options, looking for opportunities to educate
• Oversee the showroom floor when working
• Maximize resources and minimize waste
• Coordinate short and long term goals and tasks
• Open and close the show room floor including cash drawers, inventory, etc
• Pre-package product
• Maintain inventory by daily weighing, tracking, and accounting
• Maintain display cases with proper signage and products and keep clean and tidy
• Order, store, and distribute showroom floor and office supplies
• Document processing and other data
• Receive products physically and within our inventory system (Quickbooks POS)
• Order and Replenishing low inventory, stock, supplies, etc.
• Network and make connections for the Collective
• Organize showroom and area where supplies are kept and Keep showroom tidy

Consults with
• Showroom floor staff
• Member Services Guards
• Administrators
• Board of Directors including the Executive Director
• Other members of the collective

Term of employment
90-Day probation, weekly compensation.

Qualifications
• Strong sense of customer service
• Good organizational skills
• Supervisory experience
• Knowledge about cannabis as a medicine
• experience interacting with patients
• activism encouraged
• Knowledge of Kushman Veganics helpful
• Ability to lift a minimum of 25 pounds
• Experience with photoshop encouraged

We want applicants that take medical cannabis as seriously as we do. Knowledge of medical cannabis politics in Los Angeles, California and USA is a plus.

You must be a qualified medical cannabis patient or caregiver and you must be a member of our collective. Long and varied hours required. Night and Weekends a must. Flexibility needed. Fast-pace environment. Lots of standing, moving, lifting, etc.

We will only respond to inquiries that demonstrate some of what we are looking for via resumes, cover letters and references.

We will be unable to discuss job opportunities with members who just stop by. All communication about this position will be by appointment only. Thank you for your understanding.

Compensation is based off of experience, skill sets, and knowledge. And will not be discussed until screening process has been completed.

We are looking for the highest qualified candidate and will take all available information into consideration. Many will apply. Only one will get this job. Opportunities for growth.

Please send a cover letter, resume, and reference to the [Use apply form below ]. Please provide a cover letter explaining why you want to work in our collective.

Monday, February 21, 2011

American Facing Death Penalty in Egypt for Hemp Oil


by Phillip Smith, February 07, 2011, 11:36am, (Issue #670)


A US citizen jailed as a drug trafficker in Egypt in December after importing a shipment of non-drug hemp oil there was freed from jail late last month when mobs of protestors overran prisons across Cairo, but remains in legal limbo. Mostafa Soliman, who operates a company called Health Harvest, has so far been refused a new passport by the US Embassy in Cairo, which means he cannot leave the country. He faces a possible death penalty if convicted of drug trafficking.

http://stopthedrugwar.org/files/mostafa-soliman.jpg
Mostafa Soliman
According to the Death Penalty Project of the International Harm Reduction Association, Egypt is one of 32 countries that have laws mandating the death penalty for some drug offenses on the books. While Egypt is not among the leading drug offender executioner countries, such as Iran, China, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Singapore, and Malaysia, drug offenders do get executed there, the first one in 1989.

Soliman, 62, was born in Egypt and has retained Egyptian citizenship, but the dual citizen has resided in the US for the past 40 years. He had returned to Egypt to oversee the arrival of the hemp oil shipment.

When the shipment of bottled hemp oil arrived at Egyptian customs in December, authorities translated "hemp oil" as "hash oil," and that's when Soliman's life took a Kafkaesque turn. (Arabic does not have a distinct word for "hemp": any concoction from the cannabis plant, whether high THC or low THC, is simply called cannabis.

"Even the Egyptian drug enforcement people told me they knew it wasn't hash oil," Soliman said by phone from Cairo Friday night. "But they said they had to follow procedure."

That procedure resulted in a December 30 raid by drug enforcers on Soliman's storage facility and Soliman's arrest on drug trafficking charges. He was jailed pending trial, first at a neighborhood police station, and then, after the local police commander grew irritated by consular visits, transferred to one of Cairo's maximum security prisons.

"I was in an eight by eight cell that held as many as 30 people," said Soliman. "There were killers waiting to be hanged, thieves, rapists. That really upset me."

[
http://stopthedrugwar.org/files/tahrir-square.jpg
protests in Tahrir Square
]After Soliman had spent several weeks in prison, his Egyptian attorney managed to arrange bail, which would have allowed him to legally leave prison pending trial. But in a bizarre twist of fate, before he could be released, the current protests exploded in Cairo, and the city's prisons were besieged by mobs of uncertain provenance determined to free the prisoners. The prison guards fled the assault even as the prison caught on fire, leaving prisoners locked in their cells.

"I hid under the window," when the prison came under attack, Soliman said. "I was afraid of the Molotov Cocktails. Then the protestors came and broke the locks on the cells and freed us. It was all planned out. They knew all the military was being moved to the square for the protests and there would be little security at the prisons."

Soliman said he thought the Moslem Brotherhood was behind the attacks on the prisons, but like much else in the current crisis, the truth about that is obscure.

After fleeing the prison, Soliman went into hiding in Cairo, and contacted the US Embassy for help. He sought help in translating research reports on hemp and on obtaining a new passport -- Egyptian authorities had seized his, which meant he was effectively unable to leave the country.

But not much help was forthcoming, said both Soliman and members of the Hemp Industries Association (HIA) and Vote Hemp, leading industry advocacy groups in the US that have taken up Soliman's cause.

"I face a death penalty for selling drugs," Soliman said. "I was hoping for the embassy to help me translate some analyses and reports from the States to help me prove my case, but they don't want to do anything. I did it myself, and spent $3,000 to get it done."

organic hemp seed oil label, from Soliman's company, Health Harvest
Nor would the embassy issue him a new passport. "I went to the embassy and a representative came out and said he would try to help me," recalled Soliman. "After I waited outside for three hours, he came back out and said a photo would expedite the process. I came back with the photo the next day, and he took it and again I waited outside for two hours. Then he came out and said he could not help me," he said.


"I don't know what's going on with these people; the embassy has not been very helpful at all. They're not cooperating," he said.

"The US Embassy has not treated this US citizen with any respect," said Vote Hemp spokesman Adam Eidinger. "Our attorneys sent them a letter, and they acknowledged receipt of it and said they are looking into it, but the embassy has not been sympathetic."

Vote Hemp and the HIA launched an action alert Friday afternoon in a bid to raise the profile of the case. The alert calls on people to write Secretary of State Clinton and urge her to ensure that Soliman is issued a new passport.

"We hope the action alert will generate thousands of letters to the secretary of state," said Eidinger. "We want them to take up his cause and give him a passport. Right now, he's in legal limbo. If he goes to the airport in Cairo, he will be arrested. The only reason we can tell they won't give him a passport is these drug charges. This man's life is on the line. If he's convicted, they could kill him. Egypt does have the death penalty for drug smuggling," he emphasized.

Soliman's arrest and the US Embassy's failure to assist have aroused the ire of others in the US hemp industry. "The Egyptian authorities are just following the lead of their DEA counterparts in this ridiculous conflation of healthy, nutritious, non-drug hemp seed oil with the drug marijuana," said David Bronner, head of Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps and a major player in the US hemp industry. "It's even more ridiculous when you consider that they are accusing someone of smuggling hash into Egypt in a hemp bottle. That is so clearly absurd."

"This is a tragic mistake that could be solved with a simple drug test. Mr. Soliman is being falsely accused of importing ‘hash oil’ when in fact it was healthy hemp food," said HIA executive director Eric Steenstra. "Our campaign to free Mostafa Soliman will hopefully jump-start action at the US State Department. We recognize that the unrest in Egypt will make it more difficult for US authorities to act, but this terrible mistake by Egyptian authorities was made well before the recent protests began and in many ways symbolizes the corruption the protestors are resisting," he added.

Until something happens, Soliman is stuck in Cairo and facing the dire prospect of being tried as a drug trafficker for importing a healthy food product. He said he hoped to be able to clear matters up, but that the ongoing political turmoil made his prospects unclear.

"If this situation gets worse, I'm not going to stick around," he said. "If it clears up, then maybe my attorney can clear up my legal situation. But I still need a passport."

Congressman Tierney responds to Mr Epstein


Dear Mr. Epstein:

Thank you for your comments regarding marijuana policy. I appreciate the opportunity to respond.

As you probably know, a significant number of Americans support a doctor’s right to prescribe medications that may include controlled substances in cases that truly warrant such an approach. Initial reports have pointed to potential success in the use of such substances in the treatment of chronic pain, including marijuana for relief for cancer patients.

We continue to witness an important debate over the appropriate use of these products. However, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that federal anti-drug law allows no “medical necessity” exception to the general prohibition on selling or growing marijuana.

Regardless, I remain sympathetic with the comments of one Massachusetts public health official who stated, “we shouldn’t enforce the drug laws by making ill patients suffer.” As our medical community is satisfied that such treatment is reasonable and useful, we should insist that our guidelines be established to ensure that the use of any current illegal drugs is only for truly medical purposes. It is my intention to continue to see that sufferers of chronic pain should have available to them all avenues of relief that pose no real danger to the public.

Regardless of my stance on medicinal uses of marijuana, I do not believe that a case can be made for the legalization of recreational marijuana use. All too often, marijuana use is the first step toward the use of harder drugs. I do not believe we should ease the way for young people in particular to begin drug-using experience.

You may be pleased to know that I am an original co-sponsor of H.R. 786, legislation that would restore financial aid eligibility to students who have served penalties for drug offenses. Section 485(r) of the Higher Education Act, which bars students with any drug-related offense on their record from ever receiving federal student aid, even after they have served their penalty and rehabilitated themselves, strikes me as patently unfair and counterproductive. As a nation we should be opening opportunities for education and training to reformed drug offenders, not closing them. Higher education represents a great determinant of success in modern America, and it is unconscionable to prevent anyone from the opportunity on the basis of past – and atoned for – mistakes.

Again, than you for contacting me. Please feel free to do so regarding any issue concerning you.

Sincerely,
John F. Tierney
Member of Congress

Marijuana, Genes, Medicines And Brain Scans Help Scientists Find Better Anxiety Treatments


ScienceDaily (Apr. 22, 2008) — Right now, about half of all people who take medicine for an anxiety disorder don't get much help from it. And doctors have no definitive way to predict who will, and who won't, benefit from each anti-anxiety prescription they write.

But a University of Michigan Medical School researcher and his team are working to bring more certainty to how doctors and patients choose anxiety treatments, by probing the connection between brain activity, genetics and medication.

K. Luan Phan, M.D., and his former University of Chicago colleagues recently reported intriguing findings from a brain imaging study in occasional, non-dependent, marijuana users in the Journal of Neuroscience.

In a placebo-controlled design, they made the findings after giving the volunteers delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana, and exposing them to photographs of emotional faces, which served as signals of social communication. The study results, which showed that THC reduces the response to threat in a brain region called the amygdala, allowed the researchers to zero in on an area of the brain that might serve as a good target for new anti-anxiety drugs.

Now, with a new clinical trial that is currently seeking participants, Phan is searching for more clues as to how anxiety treatment could be tailored to the individual patient, to give the best chance that a treatment will work for him or her.

The new study will test a generic form of the drug Zoloft (sertraline), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for social anxiety disorder and other anxiety disorders. Both people with social anxiety disorder and a comparison group of people without anxiety are needed for brain scanning and genetic testing.

The idea is to see whether variations in the genes for certain brain receptors and transporters are linked with variations in how a person's brain reacts to pictures of emotional faces, and variations in how they respond to the anti-anxiety drug. This information could lead to an individualized or personalized approach to medical care.

"These two studies are trying to get to the same goal: to find better treatments for anxiety disorders that affect millions of Americans and seriously interfere with their functioning," says Phan, an assistant professor of psychiatry at U-M and the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System. "The cannabis study highlights a new avenue that we need to explore further as we try to develop novel medications, while the sertraline study will try to find out if we can tell which patients might or might not respond well, and by what mechanism, to an already existing medication known to have some efficacy in treating anxiety disorders."

Phan led the cannabis study at the University of Chicago, collaborating with Harriet deWit, Ph.D., the director of the Human Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory in the Department of Psychiatry there. Their results are based on brain scans of 16 recreational marijuana users who agreed to undergo functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI.

The researchers chose fMRI because it allows them to see in real time which areas of the brain are most active while a volunteer is performing a certain task -- for example, viewing a picture of a human face that is expressing anger or fear, or performing a decision-making exercise.

That same approach will be used in the new sertraline study, with two different scans before and after anxiety patients are prescribed the medication. The healthy volunteers in the study will also have fMRI scans, though they will not receive the drug. All study participants must between 18 and 55 years old, and those with anxiety disorders must not be taking any other medication that could be affecting the brain in order to qualify to enter the study.

The cannabis study used THC, and a placebo caplet that looked exactly like the THC caplet. The researchers found that when the marijuana users received THC, their brain's response to "threatening" faces was less than it was when they received a placebo.

The difference in response was seen in an area of the brain called the amygdala, which is a hub for the brain's ability to process signs of danger or warning, and to decide how to respond. But there were no differences between THC and placebo in the areas of the brain that process non-emotional visual signals or govern body movement -- suggesting that THC had a specific effect on a specific brain region and on a specific task of processing fear. Other researchers have shown this to be a region that's rich in a receptor called CB1, part of the brain's "cannabinoid" system.

The human brain produces compounds called endocannabinoids that act on these receptors, and are involved in anxiety and fear-learning, or the learning of which threats to be afraid of. But little has been known about the effect of THC, an exogenous cannabinoid, on the brain's own system.

For ethical reasons, the researchers did not give THC to non-marijuana users, and the study was small. But the findings in the study volunteers suggest that THC and other compounds that act on the CB1 receptors in the amygdala could be fruitful targets for new anti-anxiety medicines. Phan notes that rimonabant, a smoking-cessation and weight-loss drug not yet available in the United States for clinical use, also acts on the CB1 receptor.

Understanding how drugs such as marijuana affect the brain may also help reveal more about why people become addicted to illicit drugs or abuse certain prescription drugs, Phan notes. Some individuals may be using illicit drugs and misusing prescribed drugs to alleviate their anxiety. He hopes to investigate this issue further by studying people who have used prescription pain drugs recreationally (such as oxycodone), using new funding from the National Institutes of Health.

The THC study links three key domains of human behavior: a specific region of the brain, the function of that area, and a neurochemical agent (THC) that appears to act on them. The new sertraline study will take it one step further, by looking at genetics too. Specifically, Phan and his colleagues will look for variations ("functional polymorphisms") among several genes in individual subjects. Key among them is the gene (5-HTTLPR) that encodes the serotonin transporter protein that transports the neurotransmitter serotonin in and out of brain cells. Serotonin has long been known to be involved in depression and anxiety, and indeed most modern antidepressant and anti-anxiety drugs (such as SSRIs) work on this transporter.

Journal reference: Journal of Neuroscience, March 5, 2008, Vol. 28, No. 10, 2313-2319